OpenEngSB
  1. OpenEngSB
  2. OPENENGSB-1679

Add base documentation about the concepts of the EDB/EKB

    Details

      Gliffy Diagrams

      No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

        Activity

        Hide
        Felix Mayerhuber added a comment -

        not only add information what the advantages of the EDB, also add informations and internals (OpenEngSBModelId, supported objects, transformation steps, ...)

        Show
        Felix Mayerhuber added a comment - not only add information what the advantages of the EDB, also add informations and internals (OpenEngSBModelId, supported objects, transformation steps, ...)
        Hide
        Felix Mayerhuber added a comment -

        Admin Manual:
        *) how to change the EDB backend

        User Manual:
        *) OpenEngSBModelId
        *) OpenEngSBModel concept (+ supported Objects, ...)
        *) how to save and load from the EDB (load via EKB)

        Contributor Manual:
        *) detailed OpenEngSBModel concept
        *) detailed EDB concept
        *) detailed EKB concept

        Show
        Felix Mayerhuber added a comment - Admin Manual: *) how to change the EDB backend User Manual: *) OpenEngSBModelId *) OpenEngSBModel concept (+ supported Objects, ...) *) how to save and load from the EDB (load via EKB) Contributor Manual: *) detailed OpenEngSBModel concept *) detailed EDB concept *) detailed EKB concept
        Hide
        Andreas Pieber added a comment -

        hey felix; when do you plan to merge this one? I would like to go ahead with a framework-2.2.2 release completing this branch soon being able to release 2.3.0 before new year. thx

        Show
        Andreas Pieber added a comment - hey felix; when do you plan to merge this one? I would like to go ahead with a framework-2.2.2 release completing this branch soon being able to release 2.3.0 before new year. thx
        Hide
        Andreas Pieber added a comment -

        thinking about it we should really only name it on the v2.3.x branch; no improvments/new features for micro releases. This is only a "administrative" issue for now and for the future. I wont revert the patches

        Show
        Andreas Pieber added a comment - thinking about it we should really only name it on the v2.3.x branch; no improvments/new features for micro releases. This is only a "administrative" issue for now and for the future. I wont revert the patches

          People

          • Assignee:
            Felix Mayerhuber
            Reporter:
            Felix Mayerhuber
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: